Resilience
The capacity to absorb and to recover.
What it studies
Resilience studies the capacity of a system — organisation, building, chain — to absorb a disruption, adapt and recover, even when the disruption was not foreseen. Unlike continuity and emergency management, which work from specific scenarios, resilience concerns generic capacity to cope: slack, redundancy, diversity of sources and the ability to learn from deviation.
Why Facility Management needs it
FM constantly faces disruptions that were not in any scenario — an unexpected market shock at a supplier, a prolonged climate anomaly, a cyber incident at a chain partner. Resilience thinking helps FM build in capacity for the unknown, not only plan for the known risk.
Questions it answers
- Where does slack sit in this system, and was it deliberately built in or is it incidental?
- What happens when two independent disruptions occur simultaneously — something no scenario prepared for?
Evidence sources
- Resilience engineering literature (Hollnagel et al.); ISO/TR 41019 on sustainability and resilience within the FM standards series.
Operating and management implications
- Efficiency and resilience often stand in tension: the most efficient chain has the least margin to absorb shocks.
- Resilience is not free; slack must be explicitly justified as investment, not eliminated as waste.
Related services
- Multiple Part 3 services carrying redundancy requirements (technical management, sourcing, security)
Related capabilities
- Chain diversification and supplier redundancy
Related operating models
- Regieorganisatie — managing organisation / intelligent client function
Multiple suppliers add resilience through diversity, but raise the burden of oversight.
Related standards
- ISO/TR 41019:2024 — status as a technical report, not a standard with requirements; see the standards atlas.
The standards section arrives in Part 7.
Common misuse
- Resilience used as a synonym for business continuity, when the former is generic and the latter scenario-bound.
Current research frontier
No generally accepted metric exists to measure resilience before a disruption occurs; most indicators are after-the-fact observations of how well a system turned out to recover.
Further reading
- Hollnagel, Woods & Leveson, Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts.