Risk, Compliance & Resilience

Emergency Management

Preparing for the incident that comes anyway.

Risk, Compliance & Resilience

What it studies

Emergency management studies preparation for, response to and recovery from incidents that interrupt normal operations: fire, power failure, extreme weather, violent incident. It works with scenarios, escalation levels, crisis organisation structures and exercise programmes, treating the first chaotic hours as a phase that must be rehearsed separately.

Why Facility Management needs it

FM manages the building and service in which the incident occurs, and is almost always part of the crisis organisation — often the first party informed. Without rehearsed procedures, a manageable incident becomes extended downtime, simply because no one knew who could take which decision.

Questions it answers

  • Who has the mandate to decide in the first thirty minutes of an incident, without waiting for approval?
  • Is the last rehearsed scenario still representative of the current building and current occupancy?
  • What is the difference between the building manager's and the tenant's incident plan, and do they align?

Evidence sources

  • NFPA 1600 / ISO 22320 — incident and crisis management structures.
  • Disaster-response doctrine of safety regions (Netherlands) and comparable civil-protection frameworks elsewhere.

Operating and management implications

  • A crisis plan that has never been rehearsed is an assumption about behaviour under pressure, not a verified plan.
  • Multi-tenant buildings have multiple, sometimes conflicting crisis organisations that must be aligned in advance.

Related services

  • Emergency response teams and evacuation organisation
  • Security and control room
To the Services Atlas

Related capabilities

  • Scenario development and exercise programming
  • Crisis communication

Related operating models

All operating models

Related standards

  • ISO 22320:2018 — emergency management, incident response. See also ISO 41017:2024 (emergency preparedness and management of an epidemic) in the standards atlas: a published International Standard within the FM series.

The standards section arrives in Part 7.

Common misuse

  • An evacuation drill testing only the escape route, not decision-making, presented as full crisis preparedness.

Current research frontier

How crisis organisations function in permanently hybrid work settings — where part of the occupancy is not physically present yet still part of the continuity question — remains under-researched.

Further reading

  • ISO 22320:2018, emergency management.
  • NFPA 1600, standard on continuity and emergency management programmes.